Truck driver entitled to workers' compensation if pre-existing condition caused unexplained fall?

Can a Truck Driver Receive Workers’ Compensation if a Pre-existing Condition Resulted in an Unexplained Fall?


Long-haul truck drivers often face the risk of injuries on the job, but can they receive workers’ compensation benefits for accidents that occur outside of their employer’s facility? In a recent case, the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled against a truck driver who fell and suffered injuries while walking outside of his employer’s premises. The court concluded that the driver failed to prove that his fall was job-related, as it was caused by a pre-existing degenerative condition. Despite the driver’s argument that the fall should be covered under the neutral risk doctrine, the court sided with the employer, denying the driver’s claim for benefits.

Full Article: Can a Truck Driver Receive Workers’ Compensation if a Pre-existing Condition Resulted in an Unexplained Fall?

Long-Haul Trucker Denied Workers’ Compensation Benefits for Unexplained Fall

In a recent ruling, Arizona’s First Division Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s decision to deny workers’ compensation benefits to a long-haul truck driver who suffered an unexplained fall. The court found that the trucker failed to prove that his fall, which was attributed to a pre-existing degenerative condition, was directly related to his job.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ  Experience the Excellence of Guardrail Systems with Skyline Group

An Unexpected Fall

The truck driver, David Peterson, was employed by Navajo Express and was walking outside of the company’s facility when his leg suddenly gave out. This caused him to fall, hit a wall with his right shoulder, and collapse onto the sidewalk. Although Peterson initially experienced shock and embarrassment rather than pain, he continued his work by driving his truck and making deliveries. It wasn’t until several hours later, after taking a mandatory 10-hour break and sleeping in his truck, that Peterson began to experience symptoms of sluggishness and heavy limbs.

Upon seeking medical attention, Peterson was diagnosed with cervical stenosis and cervical myelopathy, conditions which required surgery. He subsequently filed for workers’ compensation benefits, claiming that the injury from his fall should be covered.

Dispute Over Compensability

Navajo Express and its insurance carrier denied Peterson’s claim, leading to a hearing before an administrative law judge. Peterson argued that his injury should be covered under the neutral risk doctrine, which considers unexplained falls as compensable accidents. However, Navajo asserted that Peterson’s fall was a result of his pre-existing spine condition, which would render the injury non-compensable.

Peterson testified that he had no explanation for why he fell and that he had never experienced his leg giving out unexpectedly. On the other hand, a supervisor from Navajo testified that Peterson had been walking in an unusual manner since 2013, attributing it to previous back problems. A medical expert for Peterson confirmed the existence of back problems dating back to 2013 but argued against a pre-existing condition that would explain the workplace fall.

Navajo’s medical expert, however, disagreed and maintained that Peterson’s condition was indicative of cervical myelopathy, a condition that often leads to a decline in neurologic function in the extremities. The administrative law judge found Navajo’s expert to be more persuasive, resulting in the denial of Peterson’s claim and subsequent appeal.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ  Long COVID Cases Found in 6% of Workers' Compensation Claims for COVID-19 (2020-2021)

Appeals Court Decision

Upon review, Peterson argued that the administrative law judge disregarded the importance of his testimony and failed to make a clear ruling on his credibility. The appeals court, however, disagreed and determined that the judge had considered Peterson’s testimony while ultimately basing the decision on the most convincing expert testimony and medical evidence.

With the judge finding Navajo’s expert testimony to be “most probably correct and well-founded” and supported by the evidence, the appeals court affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits for Peterson.

Summary: Can a Truck Driver Receive Workers’ Compensation if a Pre-existing Condition Resulted in an Unexplained Fall?

A long-haul truck driver was denied workers’ compensation benefits after suffering an unexplained fall outside his employer’s facility. The court ruled that the driver failed to prove that his fall, which was caused by a pre-existing condition, was job-related. The driver experienced symptoms such as sluggishness and heavy limbs after the fall and was diagnosed with cervical stenosis and cervical myelopathy, requiring surgery. The court found that his injury was not compensable because it was a result of his pre-existing condition. The decision was based on expert testimony and medical evidence, affirming the denial of benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions:

FAQ – Truck Driver Entitled to Workers’ Compensation if Pre-existing Condition Caused Unexplained Fall

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can a truck driver file for workers’ compensation if a pre-existing condition led to an unexplained fall?

Yes, a truck driver may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits even if a pre-existing condition contributed to an unexplained fall. Workers’ compensation laws generally cover work-related injuries or accidents, regardless of pre-existing conditions. However, it is important to consult with an attorney or your company’s HR representative to fully understand the specific regulations and requirements in your jurisdiction.

2. What should I do if I experience a fall while working as a truck driver?

If you experience a fall while working as a truck driver, there are several steps you should take:

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ  Supporting construction learners with neurodiversity and dyslexia: Embracing Differences and Empowering Success

– Seek medical attention immediately: Your health and well-being should be your primary concern, so make sure to get the necessary medical care as soon as possible.

– Report the incident: Notify your supervisor or the appropriate authority within your company about the fall. This will create an official record of the incident, which may be necessary for filing a workers’ compensation claim.

– Gather evidence: If possible, gather evidence such as photographs of the area where the fall occurred, eyewitness statements, and any other relevant information that could support your claim.

– Consult with an attorney: An experienced workers’ compensation attorney can help you navigate the legal process, ensure your rights are protected, and guide you through the appropriate steps to file a claim.

3. Are there any time limitations for filing a workers’ compensation claim for a fall as a truck driver?

Time limitations for filing a workers’ compensation claim vary by jurisdiction. It is crucial to notify your employer and file the claim as soon as possible after the incident to avoid potential complications. Delays in reporting can potentially weaken your case or even jeopardize your eligibility for benefits. To ensure you meet the required deadlines, consult with a workers’ compensation attorney who is familiar with the regulations in your specific area.

4. What benefits can a truck driver receive through workers’ compensation for a fall-related injury?

The benefits available to a truck driver through workers’ compensation for a fall-related injury may include:

– Medical expenses coverage: This includes the costs of necessary medical treatments, hospital stays, medications, rehabilitation programs, and ongoing therapies related to the injury.

– Disability benefits: If the fall results in a temporary or permanent disability that prevents you from working, you may be entitled to receive disability benefits, which can replace a portion of your lost wages.

– Vocational rehabilitation: If you are unable to return to your previous position due to the injury, workers’ compensation may provide vocational rehabilitation services to help you acquire new skills or find alternative employment.

It is important to note that the specific benefits and their extent may vary depending on the circumstances of the fall, the severity of the injury, and the laws of your jurisdiction.

5. Can a truck driver be terminated or face retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim?

No, it is illegal for an employer to terminate or retaliate against a truck driver for filing a workers’ compensation claim related to a fall or work-related injury. Workers’ compensation laws exist to protect employees and provide them with necessary benefits and support in the event of work-related accidents or injuries. If you believe you have faced discrimination or retaliation, you should consult with an attorney who specializes in employment law to understand your rights and seek appropriate legal action.

Previous articleConducting Safety Surveys: Understanding the Definition, Purpose, Types, and How-To Guide
Next articleFireline’s Voice Evacuation Systems: A Life-saving Secret!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here